Project Management Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

vagabond Management - Case Study ExampleThis is an added advantage for Rachel since at that while there is no distractions thence total concentration. However, although she gets to work early, in the first twenty minutes after getting into the office, she does nothing constructive. Instead, she takes these twenty minutes to socialize with her accomplice Neil. Although socializing gets an individual in a good mood to graduation exercise off the day, it is unadvisable since it may also act as a distraction (Erik and Clifford, 2011). Question 2 What does the case tell you about what it is like to be a control manager? It is worth noting that frame management is not an easy task since it is a leadership position. Therefore, as a project manager, Rachel should attain early in order to set a trend for her team members on punctuality and time management. More so, by the time the company managing director arrives, Rachel should be able update him or her on the progress of the projec t, as rise as, the working team. There are a number of managerial traits that are required of a project manager. First, project manager is a supervisor that over sees all the operations concerning the project (Erik and Clifford, 2011). For instance, Rachel spends close to of the day moving from one office to the other supervising her team, consulting with her workmates as well as reporting to her boss. Secondly, as a project manager, one should play an assistive role to his or her colleagues. For example, Rachel helps another IS project manager in reviewing the project and bringing it back on track. Finally, a project manager should be social and keep in touch with everyone within and outside their organization. Rachel communicates with her team members and discusses extensively with her counterparts from client firms. These, among other minds, show that the role of a project manager is a generally a one man task. 2) Moss and McAdams Accounting firm This case study is based on a n occurrence at the Moss and McAdams (M&M) firm that caused a conflict of interest between two managers Bruce Palmer and Ken Crosby. The disagreement was on whom Mr. Zeke Olds, a very resourceful person, should work for. However, there are a number of reasons that place Crosby as the most suitable person to work with Olds. Question 1 If you were Palmer at the end of the case, how would you respond? The first reason would be that it is not advisable to have a member of the team who is not fully commit to the roles he or she is supposed to play. In addition, it would be best for Bruce to avoid conflicting with Crosby who was an important colleague (Erik and Clifford, 2011). Question 2 What, if anything, could Palmer have done to avoid losing Olds? According to Erik and Clifford, 2011, Although Palmer would have taken some extemporaneous actions to avoid losing Olds it was the best action at the time. Initially, he could have held a discussion with both Crosby and Olds for the goal of making a proper timetable as well as setting rules that would not disadvantage any party. The second reason was that Palmer took quite a while before communicating with Ruby Sands, the manager in charge of assigning personnel to various accounts at the Green Bay Office in which Palmer and Cosby were based. Had he communicated his wish earlier, the situation would have been kept in control and his project, the Johnsonville Project, would have been kept on schedule. However, Crosby was not an understanding colleague since he expected favors although he could not return